Abstract: For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a ‘gap’ between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.
Where science meets art. The only necessary and sufficient book store in Melbourne.
Hope our friends enjoy the new look and feel – now optimised for mobile devices for access on the go.
Coordinator: Peter Ellerton
Web guy: Jason Etheridge
- What exactly is the scientific method and why do so many people get it wrong?
- Paralympic athletes faster than olympic athletes — what does this tell us about difference?
- Logic: if + then = why? How can we understand the power of logic?
- How do we ensure we are exposed to new ideas? A parody with bite.
- A Life of Meaning (Reason Not Required) – What is the nature of our relationship with reason?
- Can you name this cognitive bias?
- By what measures can we value human life?
- Teaching philosophy improves standardised scores
- Are we in control of our own decisions?
- Neuroscience and education: myths and messages
- Free will is not as free as we think – and that’s ok.
- Where’s the Proof in Pseudoscience?
- Science in the lead?
- Plato and Aristotle from ‘The School of Athens’
- Teaching the nature of science (and keeping students engaged)
- How Science Works in Action
- If it's not right to rape a rapist, how can it be OK to kill a killer?
- Queensland Philosophy and Reason Syllabus
- Pope and Darwin
- How Anecdotal Evidence Can Undermine Scientific Results
- What does it mean to think and could a machine ever do it?
- When bad consequences are predicted but are permissible if a good consequence is intended.
- Alternative Medicine - Sincerity no substitute for evidence
- Teaching the Nature of Science
USEFUL RSS FEEDS
- Humans in Dark Times
- Trump and the ‘Society of the Spectacle’
- Unraveling Love Stories
- It’s Black History Month. Look in the Mirror.
- Rethinking Our Patriotism
- Can We Live With Contradiction?
- The Intellectual Life of Violence
- Our New Age of Contempt
- Bernard-Henri Lévy: Jews, Be Wary of Trump
- The Stories We Tell Ourselves
- Deadly U.S. Heroin Overdoses Quadrupled in 5 Years
- Your Brain as Laboratory: The Science of Meditation
- The Science of Genius
- An Oscar-Nominated Film Inspires a New Approach to Autism
- How Sound Can Be an Ally or an Enemy of a Healthy Brain
- Transgender Kids: What Does It Take to Help Them Thrive?
- Life Expectancy Study Suggests U.S. Will Lag behind
- What Are Personality Disorders?
- Inner Spark: Using Music to Study Creativity
- Brain–Computer Interface Allows Speediest Typing to Date
- The data behind Hollywood's sexism | Stacy Smith
- A few ways to fix a government | Charity Wayua
- A robot that eats pollution | Jonathan Rossiter
- The racial politics of time | Brittney Cooper
- Nationalism vs. globalism: the new political divide | Yuval Noah Harari
- Don't fear superintelligent AI | Grady Booch
- How jails extort the poor | Salil Dudani
- 3 ways to fix a broken news industry | Lara Setrakian
- How to practice safe sexting | Amy Adele Hasinoff
- An electrifying acoustic guitar performance | Rodrigo y Gabriela