Abstract: For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a ‘gap’ between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.
Where science meets art. The only necessary and sufficient book store in Melbourne.
Hope our friends enjoy the new look and feel – now optimised for mobile devices for access on the go.
Coordinator: Peter Ellerton
Web guy: Jason Etheridge
- A nice Philosophy of Mind summary
- The power of categorical logic
- What exactly is the scientific method and why do so many people get it wrong?
- Paralympic athletes faster than olympic athletes — what does this tell us about difference?
- Logic: if + then = why? How can we understand the power of logic?
- How do we ensure we are exposed to new ideas? A parody with bite.
- A Life of Meaning (Reason Not Required) – What is the nature of our relationship with reason?
- Can you name this cognitive bias?
- By what measures can we value human life?
- Teaching philosophy improves standardised scores
- Are we in control of our own decisions?
- Neuroscience and education: myths and messages
- Free will is not as free as we think – and that’s ok.
- Where’s the Proof in Pseudoscience?
- Science in the lead?
- Is Obama's Nobel Peace Prize Premature?
- Ask the Philosopher column in The Australian
- Jean-Paul Sartre's notion of Bad Faith
- Humbug! The skeptic's fieldguide to spotting fallacies in thinking
- The quest for Renassaince Man
- Hypothesis forming excercise
- Slippery Slope (Cartoon)
- Categorical Logic booklet (deductive logic)
- Portal: Mind and brain
- A Wonderful Piece of Pseudoscience in Advertising
USEFUL RSS FEEDS
- Athens in Pieces: The Stench of the Academy
- Athens in Pieces: The Art of Memory
- Socrates Wants You to Tidy Up, Too
- In Memoriam: What Would Gary Gutting Do?
- The Gender Politics of Fasting
- Affirmative Action and College Admissions: ‘The Problem With Meritocracy Is That It Isn’t Meritocratic’
- The Christmas Time Capsule
- In Praise of Wonder
- Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?
- I’m for Affirmative Action. Can You Change My Mind?
- Remembering Why Curiosity Should Be Boundless
- 7 Beliefs of Emotionally Healthy People
- Humans Are <em>Still</em> Mating with Neandertals
- The One Change That Boosts a High School's Academic Performance
- Our Brains Really Remember Some Pop Music
- We Can Actually Prevent Depression in Some Cases
- Drunk Witnesses Remember a Surprising Amount
- Are Intellectuals Suffering a Crisis of Meaning?
- Can a Woman Sound Presidential?
- Why the Secrets You Keep Are Hurting You
- The age of genetic wonder | Juan Enriquez
- A love story about the power of art as organizing | Aja Monet and phillip agnew
- 3 ways to practice civility | Steven Petrow
- How doctors can help low-income patients (and still make a profit) | P.J. Parmar
- Why noise is bad for your health -- and what you can do about it | Mathias Basner
- How women in Pakistan are creating political change | Shad Begum
- Ink made of air pollution | Anirudh Sharma
- What your breath could reveal about your health | Julian Burschka
- How we can help the "forgotten middle" reach their full potential | Danielle R. Moss
- 7 common questions about workplace romance | Amy Nicole Baker
February 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3