Abstract: For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a ‘gap’ between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.
Where science meets art. The only necessary and sufficient book store in Melbourne.
Hope our friends enjoy the new look and feel – now optimised for mobile devices for access on the go.
Coordinator: Peter Ellerton
Web guy: Jason Etheridge
- A nice Philosophy of Mind summary
- The power of categorical logic
- What exactly is the scientific method and why do so many people get it wrong?
- Paralympic athletes faster than olympic athletes — what does this tell us about difference?
- Logic: if + then = why? How can we understand the power of logic?
- How do we ensure we are exposed to new ideas? A parody with bite.
- A Life of Meaning (Reason Not Required) – What is the nature of our relationship with reason?
- Can you name this cognitive bias?
- By what measures can we value human life?
- Teaching philosophy improves standardised scores
- Are we in control of our own decisions?
- Neuroscience and education: myths and messages
- Free will is not as free as we think – and that’s ok.
- Where’s the Proof in Pseudoscience?
- Science in the lead?
- The Socratic Method (M.M. McCABE)
- When media become dispensers of justice
- Are people-smugglers agents of freedom?
- Humbug! The skeptic's fieldguide to spotting fallacies in thinking
- When to lead and when to follow
- When bad consequences are predicted but are permissible if a good consequence is intended.
- Paradoxes and Their Relevance to Philosophy
- Science in the lead?
- Monkeys given Huntington's for study
- General philosophy essay marking criteria
USEFUL RSS FEEDS
- What Judaism Teaches Us About the Fear of Death
- William James’s Varieties of Irish Experience
- Mary Shelley Created ‘Frankenstein,’ and Then a Pandemic
- Our ‘Pursuit of Happiness’ Is Killing the Planet
- The Coronavirus Is Us
- How Does a Buddhist Monk Face Death?
- Are ‘Near-Death Experiences’ Real?
- Facing the Fact of My Death
- Roger Scruton Was a Conservative. But What Kind?
- What Do We Owe the Dead?
- The Problem with Telling Children They're Better Than Others
- How Can You Tell If You Have Perfect Pitch?
- The Loneliness of the "Social Distancer" Triggers Brain Cravings Akin to Hunger
- City Birds: Big-Brained with Few Offspring or Small-Brained with a Lot
- Be Yourself--Everyone Else Is Taken
- Connecting with Voters in a Time of Social Distancing
- Feeling Cooped Up? Here's How to Stay Healthy, Sharp and Sane
- Treating "Moral" Injuries
- Can Science Explain Deja Vu?
- What's Scarier than the Coronavirus?
- In uncertain times, think like a mother | Yifat Susskind
- The intangible effects of walls | Alexandra Auer
- It's OK to feel overwhelmed. Here's what to do next | Elizabeth Gilbert
- What it's really like to have autism | Ethan Lisi
- Why sleep matters now more than ever | Matt Walker
- How to make pandemics optional, not inevitable | Sonia Shah
- How you can help save the monarch butterfly -- and the planet | Mary Ellen Hannibal
- How we can navigate the coronavirus pandemic with courage and hope | Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks
- How forgiveness can create a more just legal system | Martha Minow
- How to create meaningful connections while apart | Priya Parker
April 2020 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3